Archive for November, 2009

Nov 10 2009

Deadly virus threat to troops

Published by admin under National Interest

008922-soldiersIan McPhedran – From: The Daily Telegraph

TROOPS in Afghanistan face a new scourge after an American soldier died from a dreadful Ebola-like virus called Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.

The tick-borne illness causes an agonising death as it transforms internal organs into soup and triggers uncontrollable bleeding.

Sgt Robert Gordon, 22, died in September after he was bitten on the foot by a tick at a base west of Kandahar.

The virus is transmitted by infected blood.

Australian soldiers work at forward operating bases across Oruzgan Province, northwest of Kandahar. Australian chopper crews service US bases throughout southern Afghanistan.

The disease was first reported in the Crimea in 1944, then in the Congo in 1956, according to the World Health Organisation. An outbreak was reported eight years ago in Quetta, the capital of Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, which borders Afghanistan.

The Australian Defence Force says it is aware of the risk from the deadly disease and is monitoring the spread of the tick.

Troops deploying to Afghanistan were warned about tick-borne diseases, uniforms were chemically treated, the use of insect repellant was mandatory and soldiers were taught how to examine their body for ticks, a spokesman said.

US forces have flown in 150,000 doses of swine flu vaccine following an outbreak of the deadly disease in the capital, Kabul. More than 10 people have died from the flu.

No responses yet

Nov 09 2009

Netanyahu gets blame for ailing US relationship

Published by admin under National Interest

NetanyahuJASON KOUTSOUKIS HERALD CORRESPONDENT – November 10, 2009

JERUSALEM: The Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was under attack last night over his handling of Israel’s relationship with its most important ally, the United States.

In Washington to address the General Assembly of the Jewish Federations of North America, Mr Netanyahu was left looking embarrassed as he struggled to secure a meeting with the US President, Barack Obama.

When Mr Obama finally did consent to a meeting with Mr Netanyahu – scheduled for early this morning Sydney time – his aides let it be known that he felt that the meeting was being imposed on him.

In September Mr Obama hosted a summit that brought Mr Netanyahu together with the Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, and he reportedly believes there is no need to meet Mr Netanyahu again.

”This is not how the White House works,” one Administration official was quoted telling Israeli diplomats.

”We don’t have to stand at attention when Netanyahu wants a meeting. There’s no substantive reason to hold a meeting, particularly in light of the current political stalemate.”

Mr Obama has been frustrated since taking office at Israel’s refusal to agree to freeze Jewish settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Instead, Mr Netanyahu has offered to ”restrain” settlement construction during the resumption of peace talks with the Palestinians.

Morning newspapers carried headlines yesterday declaring that Israel’s relationship with the United States was in crisis.

”This is the conclusion that stems from the difficulty in arranging a meeting between Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama,” wrote Haaretz columnist Aluf Benn. ”The delays in finding a time to meet, and pushing it to a late hour … make Netanyahu look as if Obama threw him a bone. In such circumstances it is no longer important what will be said at the meeting.”

Writing in Maariv, columnist Ben Caspit wrote that the meeting was ”purely for protocol, barely a photo-op, so that it will not be said that Bibi was in the US and didn’t see Obama.

”That is why the fiasco is so great. A chronicle of a disgrace foretold.”

Meanwhile, Mr Abbas, who announced last week he would not be standing for another term as president in elections scheduled for January 24, told a rally of supporters in Hebron that Israel did not want peace.

”I don’t know what the Israelis want,” he said. ”They must start thinking about what needs to be done if they really want peace.”

He insisted he was not setting preconditions for joining another round of negotiations.

No responses yet

Nov 02 2009

Space arms race ‘an inevitability’

Published by admin under National Interest

armsraceFrom correspondents in Beijing, China - AFP

A TOP China air force commander has called the militarisation of space an “historical inevitability”, state media said today, marking an apparent shift in Beijing’s opposition to weaponising outer space.

In a wide-ranging interview in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Daily, air force commander Xu Qiliang said it was imperative for the PLA air force to develop offensive and defensive operations in outer space.

“As far as the revolution in military affairs is concerned, the competition between military forces is moving towards outer space… this is a historical inevitability and a development that cannot be turned back,” Commander Xu told the paper.

“The PLA air force must establish in a timely manner the concepts of space security, space interests and space development.

“We must build an outer space force that conforms with the needs of our nation’s development (and) the demands of the development of the space age.”

Superiority in outer space can give a nation control over war zones both on land and at sea, while also offering a strategic advantage, Commander Xu said, noting that such dominance was necessary to safeguard the nation.

“Only power can protect peace,” the 59-year-old commander said in the interview given to coincide with this month’s 60th anniversary of the founding of the PLA air force.

China has long stated that it supported the peaceful uses of outer space and opposed the introduction of weapons there. Beijing has also sought to establish an international treaty to control the deployment of weapons in space.

In January 2007, China surprised the world by shooting down one of its own weather satellites in a test seen by many, including the United States, as a possible trigger of an arms race in space.

No responses yet